Decoding the Cynical Method in Mamata’s Political Madness
Ernst Röhm, the boss of Brown Shirts, whose rough
shoulders carried Adolf Hitler into the German Chancellery, was keen to induct
them into the Wehrmacht that was set to replace Reichswehr. However, the Fuehrer, whose vision was to develop
a world-beating armed force, saw no role for Röhm’s riff-raff in its
professional setup. But as the rebuffed deputy could unleash his Storm Troopers
on his regime itself, the real politic constrained the Nazi numero uno to usher
in the Night of the Long Knives but for which, the rights and wrongs apart, the
Third Reich wouldn’t have had such a formidable army with the Panzers at its
helm.
That was in the early
thirties of the last century and now in the nascent twenties of the current
one, India’s West Bengal faced a Röhm moment as Mamata Banerjee, the Trinamool
supremo, led her party to a resounding victory in the assembly polls, however, fouled
by her personal loss at the hustings. Thus, while Narendra Modi, the Prime
Minister, and Amit Shah, the Home Minister, who together led a no-holds-barred
poll campaign to uproot the unruly Trinamool, have been licking their political
wounds and counting their electoral losses, one would have expected Mamata Didi,
who had the last laugh by remaining in the saddle to prove the Bengal
electorate right that is courtesy the country’s constitution, which enabled her
to take another shot in a by-election, to be conciliatory to her opponents. But
then, she has to contend with her formidable support base of the aggressive
Muslim constituency that she cultivated for electoral aggregation that came to
perceive the Trinamool victory as a license to pursue their extremist Islamist
agendas, and so began to run amuck amongst the Hindus, who sought to spoil
their party by voting for Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). That was the
Röhm moment for Mamata, which put her in a catch- 22 situation of her own
making.
Well, she could only rein in the rampaging Muslim
miscreants, euphemistically called Trinamool goons by the compromised Islamapologic
media, at the cost of imperiling her solid vote-bank of roughly one third of
the State’s electorate. Besides, with her extreme-Muslim-appeasement governance
model, she had already burnt most of her electoral bridges with the majority of
the Bengali Hindus, save the supercilious Bhadralok,
who seem to take pride in swimming away from the pan-Indian political mainstream.
This aspect of the Bengal’s political reality was underscored by her electoral
loss at Nandigram, albeit by a narrow margin, to Suvendu
Adhikari, her confidante turned contestant, who meaningfully dubbed her as
Begum in his election rallies.
Thus, with her political survival inexorably
linked to the formidable Muslim constituency, unceasingly buttressed by the successive
pseudo-secular administrations of varied hues and cries that turned a blind eye
to the hordes of Muslim intruders from the neighboring Bangladesh, she was
caught in a demographic quagmire. That in her Muslim-engineered electoral
triumph, the minimal contribution of the overwhelming, though fragmented, Hindu
majority is a cause for her future political worries cannot be over stated.
That being the case, getting tough with the Muslim miscreants out at the Hindu
throats could tantamount to her denting the minority vote-bank, which would be nothing short of a political
suicide in the democratic arena. Even otherwise, there is a strange
compatibility between Mamata's roguish behaviour
and Muslims' aggressive mentality that make them made for each other, which
fact she seems to have recognized only after coming to power in 2011 by storming into the Left
citadel over the industrial ruins of Singur. Why, in 2006, she made a ruckus in the Lok Sabha over
the Speaker's rejection of her adjournment motion on illegal infiltration
of Bangladeshis into West Bengal!
Though she retained power in 2016, despite her
lackadaisical governance, the spectacular performance of the BJP in the 2019
parliamentary polls made her rush to the poorer women with all sorts of sops to
shore up her scam-ridden Trinamool in the ensuing 2021 assembly polls.
Nevertheless, BJP's high pitch campaign in them made her nervous to the core,
so much so that she opted to migrate from her shaky Bhowanipore constituency to
the safe Muslim-profuse Nandigram, in part driven by her egotistic urge to
crush Suvendu
Adhikari to his political death, well, to come a cropper. However, during the
month-long election regimen, what with the vexed Hindu wind seemingly turning
against her and her party men, she turned to the Muslim voters with folded
hands not to split their votes in favour of the other secular pretenders and that
earned her a reprimand from India’s Election Commission.
However, if only she had a grasp of the Islamic psyche,
there was no need for her to go to such desperate communal lengths as
Muslims anyway would strive to ensure BJP's defeat, not because its
rule materially hurts them as in deed their kin in Modi’s Gujarat became a
prosperous lot. What is not adequately appreciated is that the Muslims, who
perceive themselves as the erstwhile rulers of Hindustan, feel emotionally
slighted to be ruled by it that unabashedly espouses the Hindu causes. It
was thus, aided by the Muslim hatred
towards her rival and her sops for the poor, her Trinamool once again steamrolled
into the corridors of Nabanna, the seat of the State power.
Though the agenda-driven media, so as not to
give any leg up to the hated Narendra Modi, downplayed her Nandigram debacle,
she was so rankled by it as to make William Congreve's words ring true - heaven
has no rage, like love to hatred turn'd, nor Hell a fury like a woman scorn's.
Thanks to the electronic voting machines, as it was apparent that her humiliation was owing to the hostility
of the Hindu voters, anyway the post-poll targets of her Islamist supporters,
how does the question of their rescue arise? Her personal pique apart, there is
real politik at play as well for what if the momentum of the adverse consolidation
of Hindu voters that began in seventy-seven constituencies in 2021 picks up in
the rest of them in the future; more in Bhowanipore from where she is all set
to contest to retain her chief ministerial chair, and in 2024 parliamentary polls in which she
hopes to pitch herself as the opposition’s
prime ministerial candidate. So, as offense is the best form of
time-tested defense, go after the Hindus, who dared to vote for the BJP, to
make an example of them so that none ever dares to repeat the mistake in their
living memory, seems to be the cynical method in Mamata’s political
madness.
Thus, in such a setting, as the election
commission dutifully conducts future elections in West Bengal, the vulnerable
Hindu voters, who are averse to Trinamool, would keep away from the polling
booths thereby facilitating Mamata and / or her successor to lord over it till
such a time when the Muslim minority becomes its electoral majority to be able
to eventually ensconce its members in the seats of power. Why doubt that
as the short-sighted Mamata is sure to open the long Bangladeshi borders to
further augment her vote-bank to counter the Hindu apathy towards her, and
hasn’t one of her Islamist worthies recently proclaim that once Muslims
reach the thirty percent threshold in India there would be four more Pakistans?
That is apart from the avowed goal of every sub-continental Musalman to turn
Hindustan into Ghazwa-e-Hind.
So, even as the colonial British dismembered India, its
regional satraps such as Mamata, if not reined in, in time, could cause its
further fragmentation with impunity. No denying that the Modi-sarkar can
deservedly pat itself for having reined in the separatist forces in the Kashmir
valley but what about the out-of-control West Bengal and the Christian surge in
Andhra Pradesh, estimated to have already covered over a quarter of its
population, making it a fertile ground for the Mamata model of politicking, if
need be. The tragedy of India hitherto is that all political dispensations
across the board, barring the honorable exception of the BJP, have been aiming
for a share in the minority vote-bank and thus were not averse to the inimical
demographic alterations, be it the form of Bangladeshi Muslim infiltration into
West Bengal and Assam or the local Christian conversion sprees in Andhra
Pradesh, Tamil Nadu etc. Well, it may be tempting to fault the late YS
Rajasekhar Reddy and his son YS Jaganmohan Reddy, chief ministers both, for
systematically Christianizing the Hindu hinterland in Andhra Pradesh but
Chandra Babu Naidu, who was in a political position to checkmate their
evangelical moves is to be equally blamed for having turned a blind eye, eying
some electoral crumbs from the High Christian table, and sadly, BJP that could
have stalled the religious disorder has had no political ground there whatsoever.
What of now to avert further demographic distortion of
Bharat that is India? To start with, BJP must begin a public awareness drive
within and without West Bengal about the perils posed by the Trinamool politics
to the unity and integrity of the country. It also needs to build public
opinion to force the Indian media to put an end to the pseudo-secular political
correctness that somehow came to rule the nation’s public discourse. It should
strive to develop an intellectual climate conducive to reviewing the fact-checked
demographic changes and the socio-political implications thereof. Besides, Modi-sarkar
should devise methods to bring India’s substantial religious minorities into
the national emotional fold resulting in the diffusion of their separatist
identities, which, in turn, would dent their religious zeal to bring others
onto their sectarian paths.
However, in the short-run, the onus is on the Me Lords of the
Supreme Court, who have come to fancy themselves as the sole-protectors of the Indian
democratic order, to nip Mamata’s political disorder by banishing her from Bengal’s
electoral arena to make an example of her to dissuade others from embarking
upon the dangerous course set by her, and the Indian Constitution does grant
them that extraordinary power.
Labels: Bangladeshi infiltration into India, Indian Muslims, Indian Politics, Muslim appeasement, Political Science, Social science, vote-bank politics, West Bengal
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home