While in his personal disposition, a liberal is ‘open-minded,
not prejudiced’ (his heart), his ideological underpinnings are ‘favouring
individual liberty, free trade and moderate political and social reform’ (his
mind). On the other hand, a leftist is someone who vouches for ‘radical
socialism that advocates the political and economic theory of social
organization, wherein a whole community owns and controls the means of
production, distribution, and exchange’.
Thus, the left-liberal tag that is loosely bandied about
by assorted politicos and upstart elites in the arena of political correctness is
nothing but an oxymoron brand. Be that as it may, even as these left-liberals tend
to wear their hearts on their sleeves, yet they lock-up their minds in closets
of bias.
Consider the liberals’ holistic hostility towards
capitalism, wherein ‘goods are produced and distributed through private
investments’, though it is in synchrony with their ideological moorings of
‘favouring individual liberty and free trade’. What is worse, their ‘liberal’
endorsement of the socialistic economic model that is in juxtaposition to the ‘individual
liberty’ that they swear by only illustrates the state of their closed minds.
This is when there is no ambiguity about the ideological delineation of these
economic models, and when it comes to Islam, which advocates peace in one ayat and obligates violence in another,
the left-liberal ideological confusion is understandable.
Thus, nothing exposes the left-liberals’ ideological
hypocrisy than their dubbing the criticism of the incongruities in Islam that
goes against the grain of their own cherished ‘individual liberty’ as
Islamophobia. Leave alone espousing reforms in the misogynistic Islamic order,
not to speak of its medieval social mores and inhuman punishments to the
deviants, that they are averse to even debate about it underscores their closed
minded callousness. But lo, they find themselves in the forefront, crying
hoarse, when it comes to the aberrations in Hinduism.
Naturally, this absurd ‘liberal’ behaviour begs for an
answer.
It’s not that the left-liberals are intellectually
vacuous so as not to understand the illiberality of Islam or the irrationality
of its exploitative clerics. They are as much privy to the tenets of Islam and
the ways of the Musalman as the critiquing non-Muslim majority, and are no less
aware that Islam does not countenance change and castigates would-be reformers
as apostates with telling consequences. And that explains the paucity of
left-liberals in the Muslim majority countries.
All this should have obliged them to lend their ‘liberal’
voice to help the Muslims living in non-Islamic countries to usher in reforms,
but yet the left-liberals side with the Mullahs to help them retain their
fundamentalist grip over the hapless umma.
Why so? Maybe, realizing that Muslims are beyond redemption, the left-liberals
could have subconsciously developed an intellectual contempt for the community
at large. What’s worse, in the Muslim intransigence the left-liberals seem to
have sensed an opportunity for overkill on political correctness by branding
even the well-meaning criticism of Islam as Islamophobia that is besides taking
the cudgels on behalf of the radical Muslims. Never mind the human rights of
the Musalmans, who too are human after all. It’s time the genuine liberals come
out of the left-lib’s hypocritical shadows
to initiate a constructive debate to bring about a course correction.
Labels: Indian left-libs, Indian liberals, Indian pseudo secularists, Islamapologists, Left-libs, Leftists, Liberals, Libtards, Maoists, Pseudo secularists, Secularists
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home